Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147989›Full record

ArticleInternational Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering : [proceedings]. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering2017

Automated Segmentation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Struts in Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography Images.

Junedh M Amrute, Lambros Athanasiou, Farhad Rikhtegar, José M de la Torre Hernández, Tamara García Camarero, Elazer R Edelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering : [proceedings]. International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Junedh M AmruteDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lambros AthanasiouInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Farhad RikhtegarInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
José M de la Torre HernándezInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tamara García CamareroH.U.M. de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Elazer R EdelmanInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA, USA.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS), the next step in the continuum of minimally invasive vascular interventions present new opportunities for patients and clinicians but challenges as well. As they are comprised of polymeric materials standard imaging is challenging. This is especially problematic as modalities like optical coherence tomography (OCT) become more prevalent in cardiology. OCT, a light-based intracoronary imaging technique, provides cross-sectional images of plaque and luminal morphology. Until recently segmentation of OCT images for BVS struts was performed manually by experts. However, this process is time consuming and not tractable for large amounts of patient data. Several automated methods exist to segment metallic stents, which do not apply to the newer BVS. Given this current limitation coupled with the emerging popularity of the BVS technology, it is crucial to develop an automated methodology to segment BVS struts in OCT images. The objective of this paper is to develop a novel BVS strut detection method in intracoronary OCT images. First, we preprocess the image to remove imaging artifacts. Then, we use a K-means clustering algorithm to automatically segment the image. Finally, we isolate the stent struts from the rest of the image. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated using expert estimations on 658 annotated images acquired from 7 patients at the time of coronary arterial interventions. Our proposed methodology has a positive predictive value of 0.93, a Pearson Correlation coefficient of 0.94, and a F1 score of 0.92. The proposed methodology allows for rapid, accurate, and fully automated segmentation of BVS struts in OCT images.

Indexed as

Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS)K-means clusteringOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)

Identifiers

PMID30147989
PMCPMC6104816
OpenAlexW2783934756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.