Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147938›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science. Nano2017

Intergenerational responses of wheat (

Cyren M Rico, Mark G Johnson, Matthew A Marcus, Christian P Andersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science. Nano, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Physiological and Metabolic Responses of Wheat (ACS agricultural science & technology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Metal Homeostasis and Gas Exchange Dynamics inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Shifts in N and δNanoImpact · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cyren M RicoNational Research Council, Research Associateship Program, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001, USA.
Mark G JohnsonUS Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.
Matthew A MarcusAdvanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Christian P AndersenUS Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · USBerkeley College · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intergenerational impact of engineered nanomaterials in plants is a key knowledge gap in the literature. A soil microcosm study was performed to assess the effects of multi-generational exposure of wheat (

Indexed as

CarbonFirst generationIsotopeNitrogenSecond generationXRFδ15N

Identifiers

PMID30147938
PMCPMC6104651
OpenAlexW2586218204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.