Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147844›Full record

ArticleInternational public health journal

Condom use attitudes and HIV risk among American MSM seeking partners for unprotected sex via the internet.

Hugh Klein, Rachel L Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International public health journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hugh KleinKensington Research Institute, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Rachel L KaplanMack Center on Mental Health and Social Conflict, School of Social Welfare, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California, US.

Funding

The Center for the Study and Prevention of Drug UseR24DA019805 · NIDA · MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WAGNER, FERNANDO ANTONIO · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA019805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This chapter examines attitudes toward condom use in a national random sample of 332 MSM who use the Internet to seek men with whom they can engage in unprotected sex. Data collection was conducted via telephone interviews between January 2008 and May 2009. The following three research questions were addressed: 1) How do these men feel about using condoms, both ideologically and personally? 2) How do condom use attitudes relate to actual HIV risk behavior practices? 3) What factors underlie men's attitudes toward condom use? The findings indicated that men held weakly-positive attitudes toward condom use overall, but were noticeably more negative in their attitudes regarding the personal use of condoms. Condom use attitudes were related consistently and inversely to involvement in HIV risk practices. In both multivariate and structural equation analyses, men's condom-related attitudes were the single strongest factor associated with their involvement in risky sex. A number of factors were found to be correlated with more favorable attitudes toward condom use. These were: caring about potential sex partners' HIV serostatus, experiencing fewer drug-related problems, having a lower level of educational attainment, not preferring to have "wild" or "uninhibited" sex, higher self-esteem, being African American, and not perceiving great accuracy in the information that sex partners supply verbally about their HIV serostatus.

Identifiers

PMID30147844
PMCPMC6107085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.