Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147708›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2018

Conservation Genomics of the Declining North American Bumblebee

Clement F Kent, Alivia Dey, Harshilkumar Patel, Nadejda Tsvetkov, Tanushree Tiwari, Victoria J MacPhail, Yann Gobeil, Brock A Harpur, James Gurtowski, Michael C Schatz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The ghost ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Monoculture is good if you are a squash bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The potential consequences of 'bee washing' on wild bee health and conservation.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clement F KentDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alivia DeyDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Harshilkumar PatelDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nadejda TsvetkovDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Tanushree TiwariDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Victoria J MacPhailWildlife Preservation Canada, Guelp, ON, Canada.
Yann GobeilFaunENord, Chibougamau, QC, Canada.
Brock A HarpurDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
James GurtowskiSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States.
Michael C SchatzSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States.
Sheila R CollaWildlife Preservation Canada, Guelp, ON, Canada.
Amro ZayedDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
York University · CACold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yellow-banded bumblebee

Indexed as

Bombusbumblebeeconservationgenomicsinbreedingpathogenpopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID30147708
PMCPMC6095975
OpenAlexW2886545625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.