Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147344›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2018

Identification of key genes and pathways using bioinformatics analysis in septic shock children.

Junting Yang, Shunwen Zhang, Jie Zhang, Jiangtao Dong, Jiangdong Wu, Le Zhang, Peng Guo, Suyu Tang, Zhengyong Zhao, Hongzhou Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Screening key genes and microRNAs in sepsis by RNA-sequencing.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Article
  12. Bioinformatics Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles for Risk Prediction in Patients with Septic Shock.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junting YangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Shunwen ZhangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Jie ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Jiangtao DongThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Jiangdong WuDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Le ZhangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Peng GuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Suyu TangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Zhengyong ZhaoDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Hongzhou WangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Yanheng ZhaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Wanjiang ZhangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Fang WuDepartment of Pathophysiology, Shihezi University School of Medicine Shihezi, Xinjiang, China, zwj1117@126.com; xjwufang@126.com.
Shihezi University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisSepsis is still one of the reasons for serious infectious diseases in pediatric intensive care unit patients despite the use of anti-infective therapy and organ support therapy. As it is well-known, the effect of single gene or pathway does not play a role in sepsis. We want to explore the interaction of two more genes or pathways in sepsis patients for future works. We hypothesize that the discovery from the available gene expression data of pediatric sepsis patients could know the process or improve the situation. METHODS AND

resultsThe gene expression profile dataset GSE26440 of 98 septic shock samples and 32 normal samples using whole blood-derived RNA samples were generated. A total of 1,108 upregulated and 142 downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in septic shock children using R software packages. The Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway were analyzed using DAVID software; Gene Set Enrichment Analysis method was also used for enrichment analysis of the DEGs. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and the top 10 hub genes construction of the DEGs were constructed via plug-in Molecular Complex Detection and cytoHubba of Cytoscape software. From the PPI network, the top 10 hub genes, which are all upregulated DEGs in the septic shock children, were identified as

Indexed as

bioinformatics analysisdifferentially expressed genemicroarraypediatric septic shock

Identifiers

PMID30147344
PMCPMC6098424
OpenAlexW2886507412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.