ArticleVeterinary world2018
Use of molecular biology tools for rapid identification and characterization of
Article in Veterinary world, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A holistic review of buffalo productivity, reproductive efficiency, genetic improvement, and disease management in Bangladesh.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Review
- Unveiling resistance patterns, kmt1 sequence analyses, virulence traits, and antibiotic resistance genes of multidrug-resistant Pasteurella multocida retrieved from poultry and rabbits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pathognomonic features of Pasteurella multocida isolates among various avian species in Sharkia Governorate, Egypt.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- A Review of the Establishment of the Seed Lot System in the Production of Biological Products and Its Importance.Archives of Razi Institute · 2022Review
- Molecular Detection and Characterization ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- The immune response and protective efficacy of a potential DNA vaccine against virulent Pasteurella multocida.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Serotyping, Genotyping and Virulence Genes Characterization ofVeterinary sciences · 2020Article
- Molecular characteristic ofVeterinary world · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to create rapid characterization and genotyping of MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty bacterial isolates were characterized by capsular and somatic identification using conventional procedure followed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), restriction endonucleases analysis (REA), and finally confirmed by sequence analysis. Two local vaccine strains and two field isolates were identified as PM Type A and B.
resultsA total of 30 isolates were found positive for PM either morphologically and biochemically; however, multiplex PCR technique identified only 22 isolates as
conclusionPCR and REA could confirm the identity of PM and provide a rapid and reliable characterization in comparison with biochemical analysis and conventional serotyping that may take up to 2 weeks. Hence, they can reduce the time needed for polyvalent vaccine production and when the reference antisera are unavailable. Moreover, the identity of Omp-H for vaccine and field strains may provide better data to control Pasteurellosis in Egypt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.