Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30147126›Full record

ArticleGenus2018

Adult mortality in sub-Saharan Africa using 2001-2009 census data: does estimation method matter?

Clifford Odimegwu, Vesper H Chisumpa, Oluwaseyi Dolapo Somefun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clifford OdimegwuDemography and Population Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa.
Vesper H ChisumpaDemography and Population Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa.
Oluwaseyi Dolapo SomefunDemography and Population Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 2000 South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult mortality is an important development and public health issue that continues to attract the attention of demographers and public health researchers. Controversies exist about the accurate level of adult mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), due to different data sources and errors in data collection. To address this shortcoming, methods have been developed to accurately estimate levels of adult mortality. Using three different methods (orphanhood, widowhood, and siblinghood) of indirect estimation and the direct siblinghood method of adult mortality, we examined the levels of adult mortality in 10 countries in SSA using 2001-2009 census and survey data. Results from the different methods vary. Estimates from the orphanhood data show that adult mortality rates for males are in decline in South Africa and West African countries, whilst there is an increase in adult mortality in the East African countries, for the period examined. The widowhood estimates were the lowest and reveal a marked increase in female adult mortality rates compared to male. A notable difference was observed in adult mortality estimates derived from the direct and indirect siblinghood methods. The method of estimation, therefore, matters in establishing the level of adult mortality in SSA.

Indexed as

AdultDirectEstimationIndirectMortalityOrphanhoodSiblinghoodSub-Saharan AfricaWidowhood

Identifiers

PMID30147126
PMCPMC6097801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.