Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30146936›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research

Robust identification of target genes and outliers in triple-negative breast cancer data.

Pieter Segaert, Marta B Lopes, Sandra Casimiro, Susana Vinga, Peter J Rousseeuw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Efficient Algorithm for the Detection of Outliers in Mislabeled Omics Data.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pieter SegaertDepartment of Mathematics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-7242
Marta B LopesIDMEC, Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Sandra CasimiroLuís Costa Lab, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Susana VingaIDMEC, Instituto de Engenharia Mecânica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1954-5487
Peter J RousseeuwDepartment of Mathematics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correct classification of breast cancer subtypes is of high importance as it directly affects the therapeutic options. We focus on triple-negative breast cancer which has the worst prognosis among breast cancer types. Using cutting edge methods from the field of robust statistics, we analyze Breast Invasive Carcinoma transcriptomic data publicly available from The Cancer Genome Atlas data portal. Our analysis identifies statistical outliers that may correspond to misdiagnosed patients. Furthermore, it is illustrated that classical statistical methods may fail to identify outliers due to their heavy influence, prompting the need for robust statistics. Using robust sparse logistic regression we obtain 36 relevant genes, of which ca. 60% have been previously reported as biologically relevant to triple-negative breast cancer, reinforcing the validity of the method. The remaining 14 genes identified are new potential biomarkers for triple-negative breast cancer. Out of these,

Indexed as

Models, GeneticBiomarkers, TumorDatabases, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansPrognosisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumorcellwise outliersgene networksLogistic regressionsparsity

Identifiers

PMID30146936
PMCPMC6745616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.