ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Accelerating chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI with parallel blind compressed sensing.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic glucose-enhanced MRI in brain tumors.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Characterizing Metabolic and Compositional Heterogeneity of Calf Muscle Using CEST MRI at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Brain Tumor Imaging with Iopamidol CEST MRI: In Vivo Detection and Validation.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- MixBranchNet: a task-adaptive network for glioma segmentation and genotype prediction by exploiting spatial-spectral correlations in CEST MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging in Neuroinflammation: Methods, Challenges, and Recommendations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Whole-cerebrum guanidino and amide CEST mapping at 3 T by a 3D stack-of-spirals gradient echo acquisition.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- JointTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- 3D CEST MRI with an unevenly segmented RF irradiation scheme: A feasibility study in brain tumor imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- CEST-MRI for body oncologic imaging: are we there yet?NMR in biomedicine · 2023Review
- Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Review
- Accelerated multi-target chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging of the mouse heart.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Optimization of Keyhole Imaging Parameters for Glutamate Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI at 7.0 T.Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Prospective acceleration of parallel RF transmission-based 3D chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging with compressed sensing.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Is pulsed saturation transfer sufficient for differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases?Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI: What Neuro-Oncology Clinicians Need To Know.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChemical exchange saturation transfer is a novel and promising MRI contrast method, but it can be time-consuming. Common parallel imaging methods, like SENSE, can lead to reduced quality of CEST. Here, parallel blind compressed sensing (PBCS), combining blind compressed sensing (BCS) and parallel imaging, is evaluated for the acceleration of CEST in brain and breast.
methodsThe CEST data were collected in phantoms, brain (N = 3), and breast (N = 2). Retrospective Cartesian undersampling was implemented and the reconstruction results of PBCS-CEST were compared with BCS-CEST and k-t sparse-SENSE CEST. The normalized RMSE and the high-frequency error norm were used for quantitative comparison.
resultsIn phantom and in vivo brain experiments, the acceleration factor of R = 10 (24 k-space lines) was achieved and in breast R = 5 (30 k-space lines), without compromising the quality of the PBCS-reconstructed magnetization transfer rate asymmetry maps and Z-spectra. Parallel BCS provides better reconstruction quality when compared with BCS, k-t sparse-SENSE, and SENSE methods using the same number of samples. Parallel BCS overperforms BCS, indicating that the inclusion of coil sensitivity improves the reconstruction of the CEST data.
conclusionThe PBCS method accelerates CEST without compromising its quality. Compressed sensing in combination with parallel imaging can provide a valuable alternative to parallel imaging alone for accelerating CEST experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.