Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30146677›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2018

Sex Differences in Atrial Fibrillation-Update on Risk Assessment, Treatment, and Long-Term Risk.

Charlotte J Bai, Nidhi Madan, Shaza Alshahrani, Neelum T Aggarwal, Annabelle Santos Volgman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte J BaiRush Heart Center for Women, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612-3864, USA. Charlotte_J_Bai@rush.edu.
Nidhi MadanRush University Medical Center, 1717 W. Congress Pkwy, Suite 317 Kellogg, Chicago, IL, 606012, USA.
Shaza AlshahraniKing Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Neelum T AggarwalRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush Heart Center for Women, 1725 Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Annabelle Santos VolgmanRush Heart Center for Women, 1725 W. Harrison St. Suite 1159, Chicago, IL, 60612-3864, USA.
King Abdul Aziz University Hospital · SARush University · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem worldwide. While the disease plagues both men and women, this arrhythmia does not affect both sexes equally. Women are more likely to have major adverse outcomes such as stroke and its sequela; however, recent data on stroke prevention show improving outcomes. The purpose of this review of the recent literature is to summarize important updates on risk scores and management of patients with AF. RECENT

findingsIt has been well known that women have a higher risk of strokes than men when untreated or when treated with warfarin. Current risk scores emphasizing new risk factors such as the higher risk of strokes in women have been incorporated into clinical guidelines. However, with the use of direct oral anticoagulants, this sex disparity on stroke is no longer seen and women have less major bleeding than men. The use of cardiac glycosides is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer, and this medication is used more in women. Procedural complications for the management of AF are higher in women. The study of the pathophysiology of AF and its management is a rapidly evolving area of cardiovascular medicine. Sex-specific data is necessary to achieve advances in the field and improve the outcomes in both men and women.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCardiovascular disease in womenStroke prevention

Identifiers

PMID30146677
OpenAlexW2888982450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.