ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2019
Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brush Cytology, Forceps Biopsy, or Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of two intraductal brush cytology devices for suspected malignant biliary strictures: randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Brush-Based Cytology Vs Biopsy: a Comparative Diagnostic Study.Maedica · 2025Article
- False-negative factors of percutaneous transluminal clamp biopsy for suspected malignant biliary stricture: 194 cases analyzed from a single center.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- Bile is a reliable and valuable source to study cfDNA in biliary tract cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- High sensitivity of ROSE-supported ERCP-guided brushing for biliary strictures.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives While bile duct brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a well-established procedure for detecting malignant biliary stricture, its sensitivity is reportedly low. We aimed to determine the pre-ERCP factors affecting brush cytology sensitivity. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 185 patients who underwent brush cytology during the first ERCP for undiagnosed biliary stricture at our institution between January 2014 and December 2016. We analyzed the relationship of age, sex, final diagnosis, stricture location, tumor size, stricture length, total bilirubin level, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein level with brush cytology sensitivity. Results The following conditions were established as final diagnoses: benign disease, 19 cases (10.3%); intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 10 cases (5.4%); hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 38 cases (20.5%); extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 44 cases (23.8%); pancreatic cancer, 55 cases (29.7%); other malignant tumors, 19 cases (10.3%). The sensitivity and specificity of brush cytology were 60.8% and 94.7%, respectively. The stricture length, total bilirubin level, and white blood cell count in true-positive cases were significantly higher than those in false-negative cases. Furthermore, a stratified analysis of the bilirubin levels demonstrated that sensitivity was highest in patients with moderate jaundice (80% for a total bilirubin level of 10-20 mg/dL), but significantly lower in patients with severe jaundice (total bilirubin level ≥20 mg/dL). Conclusion While the sensitivity of brush cytology increases with bilirubin levels of up to 20 mg/dL, severe jaundice has a negative effect on sensitivity, warranting additional pathological examinations according to the pre-ERCP bilirubin level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.