ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2018
Comparing the Clinical Performance of the New 19-G ViziShot FLEX and 21- or 22-G ViziShot 2 Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Needles.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Yield of EBUS Mediastinal Cryobiopsy Versus TBNA in Suspected Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Prospective Multicentre Study.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- An explorative analysis on the optimal cryo-passes and freezing time of the ultrathin cryoprobe in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improved Diagnostic Yield and Specimen Quality With Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Forceps Biopsies: A Retrospective Analysis.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020Article
- Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound: historical, contemporary, and cutting-edge applications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure for pulmonary and mediastinal diseases. This study compared the performance of a novel 19-G needle with a 21- or 22-G needle. Patients and Methods Eleven patients at Okayama Medical Center were enrolled retrospectively between April and December 2017. Enlarged lymph nodes and a pulmonary nodule were sampled with both 19-G and 21- or 22-G needles in nine patients. Two patients underwent biopsies for suspected lymphoma with only the 19-G needle. We examined their medical records on the diagnosis, size of the lymph nodes and pulmonary nodule, and complications. Results The median longest diameter of the 13 lymph nodes (8 #7, 4 #4R, and 1 #11) and 1 pulmonary nodule (right segment 6) in the 11 patients was 31.6 mm (range, 10.4-45.0 mm). Definitive diagnoses were made using the 19-G needle in nine patients. EBUS-TBNA with a 19-G needle resulted in successful diagnoses of one case of retinal hemangioblastoma, one case of tuberculous lymphadenitis, and one case of lung adenocarcinoma, as well as the evaluation of the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression following initial negative findings after a 21- or 22-G biopsy. A small pulmonary nodule (lung squamous cell carcinoma) with negative findings after a 19-G biopsy was diagnosed with a 22-G biopsy. Two suspected lymphoma patients were diagnosed with a 19-G needle: one had lymphoma and the other sarcoidosis. Three patients were diagnosed with sarcoidosis using both the 19-G and 21- or 22-G needles. Conclusion EBUS-TBNA with a 19-G needle was useful for diagnosing retinal hemangioblastoma and tuberculous lymphadenitis as well as for PD-L1 testing after 21- and 22-G biopsies were unsuccessful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.