Trial reportEBioMedicine2018
Randomized study of the safety and pharmacodynamics of inhaled interleukin-13 monoclonal antibody fragment VR942.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-interleukin-13 and anti-interleukin-4 agents versus placebo, anti-interleukin-5 or anti-immunoglobulin-E agents, for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- AZD0449, an inhaled JAK1 inhibitor, in healthy participants and patients with mild asthma.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Advanced Pulmonary Drug Delivery Systems: A Narrative Review.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Developmental Progress and Future Potential for Inhaled Biologics in the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases.Drugs · 2026Review
- Review
- Inhalation-Based Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Targeting the Diseased Lower Airways in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Principles and Therapeutics ofJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Review
- Inhalational Drug Devices: Revisiting the Linchpin of Asthma Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Recent Developments in Aerosol Pulmonary Drug Delivery: New Technologies, New Cargos, and New Targets.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2024Review
- Aerosol pulmonary immune engineering.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Respiratory delivery of passive immunotherapies for SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis and therapy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Review
- Inhaled drug delivery for the targeted treatment of asthma.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Spray-Dried and Spray-Freeze-Dried Powder Formulations of an Anti-Interleukin-4Rα Antibody for Pulmonary Delivery.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Article
- Monoclonal antibodies in the management of asthma: Dead ends, current status and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Optimization of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Therapies: Roadmap to Improve Clinical Effectiveness and Implementation.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Review
- Interferon-Disease markers · 2022Article
- The future of inhalation therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022Review
- Cellular Immunotherapy and the Lung.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Local Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with a Spray-Dried Bevacizumab Formulation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Article
- Inhalation monoclonal antibody therapy: a new way to treat and manage respiratory infections.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterleukin-13 (IL-13) is a key mediator of T-helper-cell-type-2 (Th-2)-driven asthma, the inhibition of which may improve treatment outcomes. We examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of VR942, a dry-powder formulation containing CDP7766, a high-affinity anti-human-IL-13 antigen-binding antibody fragment being developed for the treatment of asthma.
methodsWe conducted a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study at Hammersmith Medicines Research, London, UK, which is now complete. Healthy adults aged 18-50 years (n = 40) were randomized 3:1 to a single inhaled dose of VR942 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10, or 20 mg, or placebo. Adults aged 18-50 years who were diagnosed with asthma for ≥6 months before screening, and had forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
findingsIn the VR942 and placebo groups, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 10/30 (33%) and 0/10 (0%) healthy participants, and in 16/29 (55%) and 9/16 (56%) participants with asthma, respectively. Mild intermittent wheezing occurred in 7 participants (VR942 20 mg, n = 4; corresponding placebo, n = 3), resolving spontaneously within 1 h. All TEAEs were mild or moderate; there were no deaths, serious adverse events, or clinically significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiograms, or laboratory parameters. There was no clinically significant immunogenicity, with only one participant with asthma considered positive for treatment-related immunogenicity for CDP7766.
interpretationThis study, considered to be the only example of a dry powder anti-IL-13 fragment antibody being administered via inhalation, demonstrated that single and repeat doses were well tolerated over a period of up to 10 days in duration. Rapid and durable inhibition of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (secondary outcome) provided evidence of pharmacological engagement with the IL-13 target in the airways of participants diagnosed with mild asthma. These data, together with the numerical improvements observed for predose FEV
fundingStudy funding and funding for the medical writing and editorial support for preparation of the manuscript were split equally between the two study co-funders (Vectura Ltd and UCB Pharma).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.