Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30146183›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2018

Co-expression in Single-Cell Analysis: Saving Grace or Original Sin?

Megan Crow, Jesse Gillis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Megan CrowCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Jesse GillisCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, One Bungtown Road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA. Electronic address: jgillis@cshl.edu.

Funding

Revealing the transcriptomic basis of neuronal identity through functional meta-analysisR01MH113005 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
Heuristics to evaluate biomedical and genomic knowledge bases for validityR01LM012736 · NLM · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI GILLIS, JESSE · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Meta-analysis to define neuronal diversity: from genes to functions across speciesF32MH114501 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI CROW, MEGAN · 2017 to 2018
$111k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH114501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113005NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a fundamental unit of life, the cell has rightfully been the subject of intense investigation throughout the history of biology. Technical innovations now make it possible to assay cellular features at genomic scale, yielding breakthroughs in our understanding of the molecular organization of tissues, and even whole organisms. As these data accumulate we will soon be faced with a new challenge: making sense of the plethora of results. Early investigations into the replicability of cell type profiles inferred from single-cell RNA sequencing data have indicated that this is likely to be surprisingly straightforward due to consistent gene co-expression. In this opinion article we discuss the evidence for this claim and its implications for interpreting cell type-specific gene expression.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingGenomeHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptomecell typeco-expressionreplicabilitysingle-cell RNA-seqtranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30146183
PMCPMC6195469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.