ArticleBrazilian journal of physical therapy
How to increase the visibility of scientific articles through social media?
Article in Brazilian journal of physical therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Evolution of documents related to performance in boccia: a paralympic sport bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- What are the variables associated with Altmetric scores?Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The impact of low back pain systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines measured by the Altmetric score: Cross-Sectional study.Brazilian journal of physical therapyPooled it
- Recommendations for Image and Video Articles in Scholarly Publishing.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Evolution of documents related to the influence of physical activity and functional capacity throughout the aging process: a bibliometric review.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Exercise therapy in the treatment of tendinopathies of the lower limbs: a protocol of a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.