Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30146048›Full record

ReviewInternational review of neurobiology2018

The Role of Patient-Practitioner Relationships in Placebo and Nocebo Phenomena.

Maxie Blasini, Nathalie Peiris, Thelma Wright, Luana Colloca

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Placebo effects in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2021 · on this map
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Placebo and nocebo effect in pain.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxie BlasiniAcupuncture and Chinese Medicine Program, Pacific College of Oriental Medicine, San Diego, CA, United States.
Nathalie PeirisDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Thelma WrightDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Luana CollocaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; Department of Pain Translational Symptom Science, School of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: colloca@umaryland.edu.

Funding

Chronic orofacial pain: genetics, cognitive-emotional factors, and endogenous modulatory systemsR01DE025946 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlacebo and nocebo effects form part of all therapeutic environments and play a significant role in the effectiveness of treatment outcomes. Patient expectancies drive these phenomena, which can be shaped through contextual factors including verbal suggestions, conditioning, and social observation.

objectivesThis review seeks to identify the biopsychosocial factors of the patient-practitioner interaction that play a role in the development of placebo and nocebo effects, as well as the anthropological elements of the biodynamic process of relating that are meaningful in the development of expectancies.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review of frameworks of the placebo and nocebo effect, including the impact of expectancies and interpersonal relationships in the context of healing and the clinical setting.

resultsExpectancies leading to placebo and nocebo effects can be modified by macro and micro factors, such as culture and society, as well as individual psychobiological traits, respectively. The developmental sociobiological adaptations that form and consolidate mindsets and meaningful contexts play an important role in shaping patient expectancies, as well as patients' conscious and subconscious reactions to signs and actions taking place within the clinical environment. Practitioner characteristics, like empathy, friendliness, and competence, favor the formation of positive expectancies. Caring and warm patient-practitioner interactions can enhance the therapeutic value of clinical encounters when patients' positive expectancies are actively encouraged and engaged.

conclusionA patient-centered approach rooted in demonstrating care and empathy can positively enhance a patient's experience within the clinical environment and activate psychosociobiological adaptations associated with the placebo phenomenon. Pain patients could particularly benefit from non-invasive approaches for improving treatment effectiveness and quality-of-life.

Indexed as

Nocebo EffectPhysician-Patient RelationsAnthropologyEmotionsHumansPlacebosPsychologyTreatment OutcomePlacebosAdaptationAffect attunementAnthropologyEmotional resonanceExpectancyNocebo effectsPlacebo effectsPsychosociobiological factors

Identifiers

PMID30146048
PMCPMC6176716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.