ArticleJournal of gambling studies2019
Where's the Bonus in Bonus Bets? Assessing Sports Bettors' Comprehension of their True Cost.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Correlates of Sports Betting: A Systematic Review.Journal of gambling studies · 2023Pooled it
- Sports betting around the world: A systematic review.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of inducements on sports gambling and decision-errors: An experimental study.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Trial
- Dark patterns in online gambling: A scoping review and classification of deceptive design practices.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2026Article
- More frequent use of live sports-betting features is associated with increased risk of gambling harm: Evidence from a case-control design.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2026Article
- (Mis)Comprehension and (Mistaken) Attractiveness of Financial Gambling Inducements among UK Bettors.Journal of gambling studies · 2026Article
- The feasibility and acceptability of an inoculative intervention video for gambling advertising: a focus group study of academics and experts-by-experience.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- The Relevance of Marketing in Sports Betting Perceptions and Behaviors Across Different age Groups.Journal of gambling studies · 2024Review
- Impact of wagering inducements on the gambling behaviors of on-line gamblers: A longitudinal study based on gambling tracking data.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022Observational
- What's the Message? A Content Analysis of Emails and Texts Received from Wagering Operators During Sports and Racing Events.Journal of gambling studies · 2020Article
- Associations between recalled use of legal UK youth gambling products and adult disordered gambling.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020Article
- Gender Differences in Problem Gamblers in an Online Gambling Setting.Psychology research and behavior management · 2020Article
- Impact of Wagering Inducements on the Gambling Behaviors, Cognitions, and Emotions of Online Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Television gambling advertisements: Extent and content of gambling advertisements with a focus on potential high-risk commercial messages.Addictive behaviors reports · 2019Article
- Sports betting incentives encourage gamblers to select the long odds: An experimental investigation using monetary rewards.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wagering inducements with bonus bets are prominently marketed and often have play-through conditions requiring further expenditure. However, these conditions are not usually presented in the inducement advertisement and may be difficult to locate. The play-through conditions themselves are complex and may lead bettors to miscalculate the inducement's true cost. Therefore, in relation to inducements with bonus bets, this study aimed to assess: (1) whether their perceived attractiveness varies with the amount and type of information provided about their play-through conditions; (2) bettors' comprehension of their true cost; and (3) whether bettors' comprehension of their true cost varies with problem gambling severity. A sample of 299 Australian sports bettors completed an online survey and rated the attractiveness of three variations of an inducement. Promo1 simply noted that "terms and conditions apply"; promo2 included the terms and conditions immediately below the offer; and promo3 revealed the true cost of the offer. Respondents were asked to calculate the true cost before this was revealed. The study found that detailing key terms and conditions for an offer directly below the advertisement impacts negatively on its perceived attractiveness. Moreover, nearly three in five bettors underestimated the additional amount they would need to bet to access any winnings from the bonus bet. No significant differences were found amongst gambler risk groups. The results imply that current approaches to marketing these inducements are likely to lead consumers to overestimate their attractiveness and underestimate their cost. To enhance responsible gambling practice, these promotional offers should be presented in ways that enable informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30145779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.