Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145750›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2018

Modeling Human Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in the Mouse.

Fariba Behbod, Angelica M Gomes, Heather L Machado

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Models for Studying Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Progression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Escape from breast tumor dormancy: The convergence of obesity and menopause.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Molecular Changes Accompanying Disease Progression.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fariba BehbodDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Angelica M GomesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, #8543, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Heather L MachadoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, #8543, New Orleans, LA, USA. hmachado@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6889-6139
Tulane University · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Progression of DCIS to Invasive Breast Cancer through CCR2 Chemokine SignalingR01CA172764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHENG, NIKKI · 2013 to 2024
$4.2M
Mechanisms promoting the transition to invasive cancerR01CA212518 · NCI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI MACHADO, HEATHER L · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Identifying the Molecular and Cellular Basis of Invasive Phenotype in Human DCISR01CA207445 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BEHBOD, FARIBA · 2017 to 2019
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172764NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207445NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer development is a multi-step process in which genetic and molecular heterogeneity occurs at multiple stages. Ductal carcinoma arises from pre-invasive lesions such as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which progress to invasive and metastatic cancer. The feasibility of obtaining tissue samples from all stages of progression from the same patient is low, and thus molecular studies dissecting the mechanisms that mediate the transition from pre-invasive DCIS to invasive carcinoma have been hampered. In the past 25 years, numerous mouse models have been developed that partly recapitulate the histological and biological properties of early stage lesions. In this review, we discuss in vivo model systems of breast cancer progression from syngeneic mouse models to human xenografts, with particular focus on how accurately these models mimic human disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMiceDuctal carcinoma in situMammary intraepithelial neoplasiaPremalignancy

Identifiers

PMID30145750
PMCPMC6244883
OpenAlexW2888264732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.