Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145731›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI texture analysis for grading gliomas.

Austin Ditmer, Bin Zhang, Taimur Shujaat, Andrew Pavlina, Nicholas Luibrand, Mary Gaskill-Shipley, Achala Vagal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Grading of Gliomas by Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics Features.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Austin DitmerUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA. ditmerad@mail.uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-2823
Bin ZhangUC Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
Taimur ShujaatDepartment of Radiology, Ohio State University, Room 460, 395 W. 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Andrew PavlinaUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Nicholas LuibrandUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Mary Gaskill-ShipleyUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
Achala VagalUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.

Funding

University of Cincinnati Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTexture analysis (TA) can quantify variations in surface intensity or patterns, including some that are imperceptible to the human visual system. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiomic based filtration-histogram TA to differentiate high-grade from low-grade gliomas by assessing tumor heterogeneity.

methodsPatients with a histopathological diagnosis of glioma and preoperative 3T MRI imaging were included in this retrospective study. A region of interest was manually delineated on post-contrast T1 images. TA was performed using commercially available research software. The histogram parameters including mean, standard deviation, entropy, mean of the positive pixels, skewness, and kurtosis were analyzed at spatial scaling factors ranging from 0 to 6 mm. The parameters were correlated with WHO glioma grade using Spearman correlation. Areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated using ROC curve analysis to distinguish tumor grades.

resultsOf a total of 94 patients, 14 had low-grade gliomas and 80 had high-grade gliomas. Mean, SD, MPP, entropy and kurtosis each showed significant differences between glioma grades for different spatial scaling filters. Low and high-grade gliomas were best-discriminated using mean of 2 mm fine texture scale, with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 86% (AUC of 0.90).

conclusionsQuantitative measurement of heterogeneity using TA can discriminate high versus low-grade gliomas. Radiomic data of texture features can provide complementary diagnostic information for gliomas.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsChildFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesGliomaMRIRadiomicsTexture analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.