Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145701›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

Correlations between metabolic texture features, genetic heterogeneity, and mutation burden in patients with lung cancer.

Seung Hwan Moon, Jinho Kim, Je-Gun Joung, Hongui Cha, Woong-Yang Park, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Keunchil Park, Joon Young Choi, Kyung-Han Lee and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The prognostic value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Baseline ¹BMC cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Respiratory research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Integrative Analysis ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiomics based onQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seung Hwan MoonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. seunghwan.moons.moon@samsung.com.
Jinho KimSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Je-Gun JoungSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hongui ChaSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woong-Yang ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Seok AhnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Ju AhnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Keunchil ParkDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Young ChoiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Han LeeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Byung-Tae KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se-Hoon LeeDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sehoon.lee@samsung.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the correlations between parameters of

methodsWe produced 106 PET indices for each tumor site that underwent genomic analysis in a total of 176 study subjects (age, 62.0 ± 10.0 y; males, 68.2%), comprising 101 adenocarcinoma (ADC), 29 squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC), and 46 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. We then examined the correlations of the PET parameters with genetic properties of HI and TMB, according to pathology and tumor site.

resultsComparisons between PET parameters and the genetic properties with false discovery rate (FDR) correction revealed that the surface standard uptake value (SUV) entropy of SUV statistics had a significant correlation with HI only in patients with SCLC who underwent a genetic test in lymph nodes (r = 0.592, p = 0.028), whereas PET parameters did not show a significant correlation with HI or TMB in patients with SCLC who underwent a genetic test in lung tissue. In patients with ADC and SQCC, there was no significant correlation between PET parameters and the genetic properties. Although SUV

conclusionsIn this study, surface SUV entropy had a significant correlation with HI in SCLC. Regarding other PET parameters and tumors, no significant correlation with genetic parameters existed.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)Genetic heterogeneityImaging genomicsPositron emission tomography (PET)Tumor mutation burden

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.