Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145683›Full record

SynthesisCurrent allergy and asthma reports2018

A Review of Portable Electronic Spirometers: Implications for Asthma Self-Management.

Delesha M Carpenter, Reina Jurdi, Courtney A Roberts, Michelle Hernandez, Robert Horne, Amy Chan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unsupervised home spirometryEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Feasibility and acceptability of home monitoring with portable spirometry in young adults with asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tele-Monitoring Applications in Respiratory Allergy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Mobile Health for Asthma.CHEST pulmonary · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Respinos: A Portable Device for Remote Vital Signs Monitoring of COVID-19 Patients.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the 175-year history of spirometry and the vital lessons it can teach us today.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Feasibility and preliminary validity of mobile spirometry in pediatric asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Validation of an app-based portable spirometer in adolescents with asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Delesha M CarpenterEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 1 University Heights, CPO 2125, Asheville, NC, 28804, USA. dmcarpenter@unc.edu.
Reina JurdiSchool of Pharmacy, University College London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, Bloomsbury, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Courtney A RobertsEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 1 University Heights, CPO 2125, Asheville, NC, 28804, USA.
Michelle HernandezSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, 104 Mason Farm Road, CB #7310, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7310, USA.
Robert HorneDepartment of Practice and Policy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, Entrance A, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9HR, UK.
Amy ChanDepartment of Practice and Policy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, Entrance A, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9HR, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAlthough portable electronic spirometers allow for at-home lung function monitoring, a comprehensive review of these devices has not yet been conducted. We conducted a systematic search and review of commercially available portable electronic spirometers designed for asthma patient use. RECENT

findingsAll devices (N = 16) allowed for monitoring of basic lung function parameters, but only 31% provided in-app videos on how to perform breathing maneuvers. Most devices (63%) provided graphical representations of lung function results, but only 44% gave immediate feedback on the quality of the breathing maneuver. Several devices (25%) were FDA-approved and cost ranged from US$99 to $1390. Information on data security (63%), measurement accuracy (50%), and association with patient outcomes (0%) was commonly limited. This review found that providers' ability to make informed decisions about whether asthma patients may benefit from portable electronic spirometers is limited due to lack of patient outcome data.

Indexed as

AsthmaHumansMonitoring, AmbulatorySelf-ManagementSpirometryAsthmaeHealthmHealthSelf-managementSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID30145683
OpenAlexW2888714845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.