Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145661›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

Oral health-related impact profile in full-mouth restored patients with two different tooth-colored restoration materials.

A Liebermann, D Edelhoff, J F Güth, K Erdelt, E Grünewald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of oral health-related quality of life following pulp therapy or extraction in paediatric patients: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Importance of an Evaluation Phase When Increasing the Occlusal Vertical Dimension: A Systematic Review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A LiebermannDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany. Anja.Liebermann@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1385-2195
D EdelhoffDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
J F GüthDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
K ErdeltDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
E GrünewaldDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestrasse 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the change of oral health impact profile (OHIP) in patients with full-mouth rehabilitations due to moderate/severe tooth wear dependent on different restorative materials (ceramic/experimental CAD/CAM composite). MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-nine healthy patients (15 male/14 female, age 44.6 ± 28.4 years) requiring full-mouth rehabilitation due to different degrees of tooth wear were instructed to fill the German version OHIP-G49 questionnaire before (baseline) and 30 days after prosthetic treatment with ceramic (n = 17) or experimental CAD/CAM composite (n = 12) restorations. Questions were divided into five dimensions: appearance, oral functions, psychosocial impact, linguistic limitations, and orofacial pain; changes between both OHIP-questionnaires for each question and patient were dissected by difference values, separately. Data were analyzed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Wilcoxon's signed-rank, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Cronbach's alpha tests (significance level p = 0.01).

resultsThe appearance dimension showed the highest results (p < 0.001, 100% improvement with all values > 0); the linguistic limitations dimension presented the lowest improvement (p < 0.001). The other three dimensions were not statistically different. No statistical differences between the two materials depending on OHIP questionnaire results occurred.

conclusionsThe esthetic appearance of the patients was influenced positively by full-mouth rehabilitation, irrespective of the material used. Improvements were also made in the parameters "toothache" and "problem of food intake." No statements could be made for the parameter "language." CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With an increasing number of patients with moderate/severe tooth wear, thorough knowledge about the improvement of OHIP is important. This information is advantageous for the consultation and handling of patients when complex treatments are planned.

Indexed as

Dental Restoration RepairOral HealthQuality of LifeComputer-Aided DesignFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTooth WearCAD/CAM compositeCeramicFull-mouth rehabilitationOHIPOral health-related quality of life

Identifiers

PMID30145661
OpenAlexW2888422163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.