ArticleClinical rheumatology2019
Efficacy and tolerance of anakinra in acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis: a retrospective study of 33 cases.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pseudogout attack following zoledronic acid treatment in primary hyperparathyroidism.JCEM case reports · 2026Article
- Is It Time to Revisit the Role of Interleukin-1 Inhibitors in Osteoarthritis?Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Review
- Anakinra for Refractory Pseudogout in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease on Haemodialysis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in the therapeutic management of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- A single-centre retrospective case series of Anakinra for incident calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- IL-1 and autoinflammatory disease: biology, pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Review
- Features and Outcomes of Microcrystalline Arthritis Treated by Biologics: A Retrospective Study.Rheumatology and therapy · 2021Article
- Outcome domains reported in calcium pyrophosphate deposition studies: A scoping review by the OMERACT CPPD working group.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) deposition is a frequent joint disease with increased prevalence in older people in whom treatment of acute CPP arthritis with conventional therapies such as colchicine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be contraindicated or not used at an optimal dose. As recommended in gout, anakinra might represent an alternative treatment for arthritis. We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of anakinra in acute CPP arthritis in a large reported series. We retrospectively included all patients receiving anakinra for acute CPP arthritis between January 2011 and 2017. The following data were collected before and 4 days after the first anakinra injection: swollen joint count (SJC), tender joint count (TJC), pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100 mm), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. A good response was defined according the evaluation of the physician. We included 33 patients (24 women; mean age 79.2 ± 12.8 years). The number of good responders was 27 (81.8%). At day 4, patients showed decreased mean VAS pain score (from 64.8 ± 26.5 to 21.2 ± 19.7 mm, p < 0.0001), TJC (5.8 ± 5.0 to 1.0 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001), SJC (3.9 ± 2.7 to 0.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001), and CRP level (116.1 ± 71.6 to 26.0 ± 23.1 mg/l, p < 0.0001). Anakinra was well tolerated, without skin complications. Only one patient had pneumonitis that was resolved with oral antibacterial agents. Anakinra could be a relevant alternative for managing acute CPP arthritis when conventional therapies are ineffective or contraindicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.