Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145597›Full record

ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders2018

Parietal Involvement in Constructional Apraxia as Measured Using the Pentagon Copying Task.

Stefan Van der Stigchel, Jeroen de Bresser, Rutger Heinen, Huiberdina L Koek, Yael D Reijmer, Geert Jan Biessels, Esther van den Berg, on behalf of the Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Constructional apraxia from the roots up: Kleist, Strauss, and their contemporaries.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  10. An update on magnetic resonance imaging markers in AD.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan Van der StigchelExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jeroen de BresserDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rutger HeinenDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Huiberdina L KoekDepartment of Geriatrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yael D ReijmerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Geert Jan BiesselsDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esther van den BergDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
on behalf of the Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficits in copying ("constructional apraxia") is generally defined as a multifaceted deficit. The exact neural correlates of the different types of copying errors are unknown. To assess whether the different categories of errors on the pentagon drawing relate to different neural correlates, we examined the pentagon drawings of the MMSE in persons with subjective cognitive complaints, mild cognitive impairment, or early dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. We adopted a qualitative scoring method for the pentagon copy test (QSPT) which categorizes different possible errors in copying rather than the dichotomous categories "correct" or "incorrect." We correlated (regional) gray matter volumes with performance on the different categories of the QSPT. Results showed that the total score of the QSPT was specifically associated with parietal gray matter volume and not with frontal, temporal, and occipital gray matter volume. A more fine-grained analysis of the errors reveals that the intersection score and the number of angles share their underlying neural correlates and are associated with specific subregions of the parietal cortex. These results are in line with the idea that constructional apraxia can be attributed to the failure to integrate visual information correctly from one fixation to the next, a process called spatial remapping.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseApraxia, IdeomotorBrain MappingCognitive DysfunctionFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental Status ScheduleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsOrgan SizeParietal LobeConstructional apraxiaNeurodegenerative diseaseVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID30145597
PMCPMC6187841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.