Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30145436›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2018

GPU-DAEMON: GPU algorithm design, data management & optimization template for array based big omics data.

Muaaz Gul Awan, Taban Eslami, Fahad Saeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muaaz Gul AwanDepartment of Computer Science, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Taban EslamiDepartment of Computer Science, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
Fahad SaeedSchool of Computing and Information Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: fsaeed@fiu.edu.

Funding

Parallel Algorithms for Big Data from Mass Spectrometry based ProteomicsR15GM120820 · NIGMS · WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTA, AJAY · 2017 to 2017
$419k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM120820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the age of ever increasing data, faster and more efficient data processing algorithms are needed. Graphics Processing Units (GPU) are emerging as a cost-effective alternative architecture for high-end computing. The optimal design of GPU algorithms is a challenging task which requires thorough understanding of the high performance computing architecture as well as the algorithmic design. The steep learning curve needed for effective GPU-centric algorithm design and implementation requires considerable expertise, time, and resources. In this paper, we present GPU-DAEMON, a GPU Data Management, Algorithm Design and Optimization technique suitable for processing array based big omics data. Our proposed GPU algorithm design template outlines and provides generic methods to tackle critical bottlenecks which can be followed to implement high performance, scalable GPU algorithms for given big data problem. We study the capability of GPU-DAEMON by reviewing the implementation of GPU-DAEMON based algorithms for three different big data problems. Speed up of as large as 386x (over the sequential version) and 50x (over naive GPU design methods) are observed using the proposed GPU-DAEMON. GPU-DAEMON template is available at https://github.com/pcdslab/GPU-DAEMON and the source codes for GPU-ArraySort, G-MSR and GPU-PCC are available at https://github.com/pcdslab.

Indexed as

Big DataElectronic Data ProcessingMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalBig-dataCUDAGPUHigh-performance-computingOmics-data

Identifiers

PMID30145436
PMCPMC6400487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.