Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144268›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2019

Risk-based approach in the revised European Union drinking water legislation: Opportunities for bioanalytical tools.

Milou Ml Dingemans, Kirsten A Baken, Ron van der Oost, Merijn Schriks, Annemarie P van Wezel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening for Chemical Compliance in Water Quality Monitoring withEnvironmental science & technology letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milou Ml DingemansKWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Kirsten A BakenKWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Ron van der OostWaternet Institute for the Urban Water Cycle, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merijn SchriksVitens Drinking Water Company, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Annemarie P van WezelKWR Watercycle Research Institute, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
KWR Water Research Institute · NL

Funding

DEMEAUEuropean Union's Seventh Framework ProgrammeSOLUTIONS project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A plethora of in vitro bioassays are developed in the context of chemical risk assessment and clinical diagnostics to test effects on different biological processes. Such assays can also be implemented in effect-based monitoring (EBM) of (drinking) water quality alongside chemical analyses. Effects-based monitoring can provide insight into risks for the environment and human health associated with exposure to (unknown) complex, low-level mixtures of micropollutants, which fits in the risk-based approach that was recently introduced in the European Drinking Water Directive. Some challenges remain, in particular those related to selection and interpretation of bioassays. For water quality assessment, carcinogenesis, adverse effects on reproduction and development, effects on xenobiotic metabolism, modulation of hormone systems, DNA reactivity, and adaptive stress responses are considered the most relevant toxicological endpoints. An evaluation procedure of the applicability and performance of in vitro bioassays for water quality monitoring, based on existing information, has been developed, which can be expanded with guidelines for experimental evaluations. In addition, a methodology for the interpretation of in vitro monitoring data is required, because the sensitivity of specific in vitro bioassays in combination with sample concentration may lead to responses of chemicals (far) below exposure concentrations that are relevant for human health effects. Different approaches are proposed to derive effect-based trigger values (EBTs), including EBTs based on (1) relative ecotoxicity potency, (2) health-based threshold values for chronic exposure in humans and kinetics of reference chemicals, and (3) read-across from (drinking) water guideline values. Effects-based trigger values need to be chosen carefully in order to be sufficiently but not overly conservative to indicate potential health effects. Consensus on the crucial steps in the selection and interpretation of in vitro bioassay data will facilitate implementation and legal embedding in the context of water quality monitoring of such assays in EBM strategies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:126-134. © 2018 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).

Indexed as

Water PurificationDrinking WaterEuropean UnionRisk AssessmentWater PollutionWater QualityDrinking WaterChemical water qualityEffect-based monitoring (EBM)Effect-based trigger values (EBT)Health riskMixtures

Identifiers

PMID30144268
PMCPMC7379647
OpenAlexW2888334755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.