Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144191›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2018

A systematic review of the next-day effects of heavy alcohol consumption on cognitive performance.

Craig Gunn, Marlou Mackus, Chris Griffin, Marcus R Munafò, Sally Adams

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The "Next Day" Effects of Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acute activation of hemichannels by ethanol leads to CaFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Craig GunnUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-3281
Marlou MackusUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Psychopharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Chris GriffinUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Marcus R MunafòUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
Sally AdamsUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies and Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKEconomic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_UU_00011/7Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1National Institute for Health ResearchUnited Kingdom Clinical Research CollaborationUniversity of Bath Research Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsStudies examining the next-day cognitive effects of heavy alcohol consumption have produced mixed findings, which may reflect inconsistencies in definitions of 'hangover'. Recent consensus has defined hangover as 'mental and physical symptoms, experienced the day after a single episode of heavy drinking, starting when blood alcohol concentration (BAC) approaches zero'. In light of this, we aimed to review the literature systematically to evaluate and estimate mean effect sizes of the next-day effects of heavy alcohol consumption on cognition.

methodsEmbase, PubMed and PsycNET databases were searched between December 2016 and May 2018 using terms based on 'alcohol' and 'hangover'. Studies of experimental designs which reported the next-day cognitive effects of heavy alcohol consumption in a 'hangover' group with BAC < 0.02% were reviewed. A total of 805 articles were identified. Thirty-nine full-text articles were screened by two independent reviewers and 19 included in the systematic review; 11 articles provided sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis; 1163 participants across 19 studies conducted since 1970 were included in the analysis. Data for study design, hangover severity, BAC at testing and cognitive performance were extracted and effect estimates calculated.

resultsThe systematic review suggested that sustained attention and driving abilities were impaired during hangover. Mixed results were observed for: psychomotor skills, short- (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) and divided attention. The meta-analysis revealed evidence of impairments in STM [g = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.15-1.13], LTM (Hedges' g = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.01-1.17) sustained attention (g = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.07-0.87) and psychomotor speed (Hedges' g = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.31-1.00) during alcohol hangover.

conclusionThe research literature suggests that alcohol hangovers may involve impaired cognitive functions and performance of everyday tasks such as driving.

Indexed as

CognitionPsychomotor PerformanceAttentionBinge DrinkingHumansMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermAlcoholcognitiondrivinghangovermemorypsychomotorsustained attention

Identifiers

PMID30144191
PMCPMC6282576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.