Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144166›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2018

Protein-Corona-by-Design in 2D: A Reliable Platform to Decode Bio-Nano Interactions for the Next-Generation Quality-by-Design Nanomedicines.

Kuo-Ching Mei, Artur Ghazaryan, Er Zhen Teoh, Huw D Summers, Yueting Li, Belén Ballesteros, Justyna Piasecka, Adam Walters, Robert C Hider, Volker Mailänder and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Safety Assessment of Graphene-Based Materials.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Enhancing RNA-lipid nanoparticle delivery: Organ- and cell-specificity and barcoding strategies.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kuo-Ching MeiInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-2154
Artur GhazaryanMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Er Zhen TeohInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Huw D SummersCentre for Nanohealth, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Yueting LiInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Belén BallesterosCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
Justyna PiaseckaCentre for Nanohealth, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
Adam WaltersInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Robert C HiderInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.
Volker MailänderMax Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Khuloud T Al-JamalInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Life Science & Medicine, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London, SE1 9NH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5165-2699

Funding

BBSRC BB/J008656/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J008656/1CERCAChina Scholarship CouncilGraduate School International ResearchMINECO SEV-2013-0295Severo Ochoa programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hard corona (HC) protein, i.e., the environmental proteins of the biological medium that are bound to a nanosurface, is known to affect the biological fate of a nanomedicine. Due to the size, curvature, and specific surface area (SSA) 3-factor interactions inherited in the traditional 3D nanoparticle, HC-dependent bio-nano interactions are often poorly probed and interpreted. Here, the first HC-by-design case study in 2D is demonstrated that sequentially and linearly changes the HC quantity using functionalized graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets. The HC quantity and HC quality are analyzed using NanoDrop and label-free liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) followed by principal component analysis (PCA). Cellular responses (uptake and cytotoxicity in J774 cell model) are compared using imaging cytometry and the modified lactate dehydrogenase assays, respectively. Cellular uptake linearly and solely correlates with HC quantity (R

Indexed as

click chemistrydrug deliverygraphenenanomedicineprotein coronatoxicity

Identifiers

PMID30144166
PMCPMC6952277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.