ArticleClinical cardiology2018
Characterization of hospitalized cardiovascular patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with mechanical circulatory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Pooled it
- Massive aortic thrombus in a hypercoagulable patient with heparin induced thrombocytopenia: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Postoperative Thrombocytopenia in Cardiac Surgery: Patterns, Differential Diagnosis and Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT).Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Engineering protein activity into off-the-shelf DNA devices.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
- A Case Report and Literature Review on Argatroban Refractory Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022Article
- Near fatal stent thrombosis in an aneurysmatic RCX as first manifestation of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) without thrombocytopenia.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Article
- Characterization of hospitalized cardiovascular patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Clinical cardiology · 2018Article
- Author response.Clinical cardiology · 2018Article
- Bacteremia in cardiac surgery patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Clinical cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byAuthor response.2018
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a pro-thrombotic, potentially life-threatening immune-mediated reaction to heparin exposure, in conservative and interventional cardiovascular medicine. HYPOTHESIS: The 4T score, validated for prediction of HIT in surgical patients before, is also suitable for assessing HIT probability in cardiovascular patients with unclear thrombocytopenia.
methodsA total of 403 consecutive patients from our Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology in whom a HIT screening test was performed between 2009 and 2016 were identified. All 72 patients with a positive screening test were subjected to a functional confirmation test (heparin-induced platelet activation test, HIPA), resulting in 23 patients with serologically confirmed HIT (positive screening test, positive HIPA) and 49 patients with nonconfirmed HIT (positive screening test, negative HIPA).
resultsThe 4TScore had a sensitivity of 82.6% and a specificity of 28.6% in our patients, suggesting that it might not sufficiently predict the clinical probability of HIT in cardiovascular patients. In both confirmed and nonconfirmed HIT, intrahospital mortality was high without a significant difference (30% in confirmed HIT vs 43% in nonconfirmed HIT). Bacteremia was more often found in patients with nonconfirmed HIT, suggesting infection as a frequent differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in these patients (49% vs 17%, P = 0.0185).
conclusionHIT screening should be initiated in cardiovascular patients with unclear thrombocytopenia despite a low 4Tscore in order to distinguish patients requiring alternative anticoagulants from those with other causes such as infections. Further research is needed to specify the risk profile for HIT in cardiovascular patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.