Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30144002›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2019

Self-narrative focus in autobiographical events: The effect of time, emotion, and individual differences.

David C Rubin, Dorthe Berntsen, Samantha A Deffler, Kaitlyn Brodar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David C RubinDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90086, Durham, NC, 27708-0086, USA. david.rubin@duke.edu.
Dorthe BerntsenCenter on Autobiographical Memory Research, Aarhus University, 8000C, Aarhus, Denmark.
Samantha A DefflerDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania, York, PA, USA.
Kaitlyn BrodarDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.

Funding

A Model of Autobiographical Memory & Its Changes in PTSDR01MH066079 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, DAVID C · 2004 to 2014
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals may take a self-narrative focus on the meaning of personal events in their life story, rather than viewing the events in isolation. Using the Centrality of Event Scale (CES; Berntsen & Rubin in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 219-231, 2006) as our measure, we investigated self-narrative focus as an individual differences variable in addition to its established role as a measure of individual events. Three studies, with 169, 182, and 190 participants had 11, 10, and 11 different events varied across the dimensions of remembered past versus imagined future, distance from the present, and valence. Imagined future events, events more distant from the present, and positive events all had increased self-narrative focus, in agreement with published theories and findings. Nonetheless, CES ratings for individual events correlated positively with each other within individuals (r ~ .30) and supported a single factor solution. These results are consistent with a stable individual differences tendency toward self-narrative focus that transcends single events. Thus, self-narrative focus is both a response whereby people relate individual events to their life story and identity and an individual differences variable that is stable over a range of events. The findings are discussed in relation to narrative measures of autobiographical reasoning.

Indexed as

IndividualityMemory, EpisodicAdultEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleThinkingTime FactorsAutobiographical memoryCentrality of Event ScaleEpisodic future thinkingIndividual differencesSelf-continuity

Identifiers

PMID30144002
PMCPMC6353681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.