Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143954›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Contemporary Cardiac SPECT Imaging-Innovations and Best Practices: An Information Statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Brian G Abbott, James A Case, Sharmila Dorbala, Andrew J Einstein, James R Galt, Robert Pagnanelli, Renée P Bullock-Palmer, Prem Soman, R Glenn Wells

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Quality metrics for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: an ASNC information statement.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Application of a deep learning algorithm to calcium scoring in myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Retrospective fractional dose reduction in Tc-99m cardiac perfusion SPECT/CT patients: A human and model observer study.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  16. The magic of improved crystal technology coupled with better resolution: Novel imaging findings may promise improved disease detection.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Effect of reduced photon count levels and choice of normal data on semi-automated image assessment in cardiac SPECT: Doing more with fewer counts.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Nuclear cardiology in the information age.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian G AbbottWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. babbott@lifespan.org.
James A CaseCardiovascular Imaging Technologies, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Sharmila DorbalaHarvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew J EinsteinColumbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
James R GaltEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert PagnanelliDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Renée P Bullock-PalmerDepartment of Cardiology, Deborah Heart and Lung Center, Browns Mills, NJ, USA.
Prem SomanDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
R Glenn WellsUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USDeborah Heart and Lung Center · USDuke Medical Center · USEmory University · USHeart Imaging Technologies (United States) · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This information statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology highlights advances in cardiac SPECT imaging and supports the incorporation of new technology and techniques in laboratories performing nuclear cardiology procedures. The document focuses on the application of the latest imaging protocols and the utilization of newer hardware and software options to perform high quality, state-of-the-art SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures. Recommendations for best practices of cardiac SPECT imaging are discussed, highlighting what imaging laboratories should be doing as the standard of care in 2018 to achieve optimal results (based on the ASNC 2018 SPECT guideline [Dorbala et al., J Nucl Cardiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y ]).

Indexed as

CardiologyNuclear MedicineHeartHumansSocieties, MedicalTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Identifiers

PMID30143954
OpenAlexW2888383392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.