Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143953›Full record

ReviewClinical drug investigation2018

Cost Estimate of Immune-Related Adverse Reactions Associated with Innovative Treatments of Metastatic Melanoma.

Francesco S Mennini, Chiara Bini, Andrea Marcellusi, Michele Del Vecchio

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Clinical and pharmacoeconomic impact of subgroup analysis in onco-hematological patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco S MenniniEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Chiara BiniEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy. chiara.stat@gmail.com.
Andrea MarcellusiEconomic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS-EEHTA), Faculty of Economics, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Columbia 2, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Michele Del VecchioUnit of Medical Oncology 2, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Foundation-National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITKingston University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveImmuno-oncology therapies represent a new treatment opportunity for patients affected by metastatic melanoma. The purpose of this study was to estimate the costs of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with the new anti-PD1 immuno-oncology therapies, with the anti-CTLA-4 immuno-oncology therapy and with the combined therapy (CTLA4 + anti-PD1) in patients affected by metastatic melanoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsA probabilistic cost-of-illness (COI) model was developed to estimate the management costs of grade ≥ 3 adverse events associated with the new anti-PD1 therapies (pembrolizumab and nivolumab), the anti-CTLA-4 therapy (ipilimumab) and the combined therapy CTLA4 + anti-PD1 (nivolumab + ipilimumab) for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective in Italy. Identification of the epidemiological and cost parameters was carried out through a systematic literature review (SLR). Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty and variation in the model results.

resultsThe model estimated a cost associated with the management of grade ≥ 3 immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma equal to €176.2 (95% CI 63.5-335.0) for anti-CTLA-4 therapy, €48.6 (95% CI 40.1-58.5) for the new anti-PDI therapies and €276.8 (95% CI 240.4-316.2) for the combined therapy. Among the innovative therapies for the considered metastatic melanoma, the combined therapy was the most expensive innovative treatment in terms of event management of immune-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events.

conclusionThis study may represent a useful tool to understand the economic burden associated with the management of irAEs associated with patients affected by metastatic melanoma.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCosts and Cost AnalysisCTLA-4 AntigenDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansIpilimumabItalyMelanomaNivolumabTherapies, InvestigationalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanIpilimumabNivolumabpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30143953
OpenAlexW2888139166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.