Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143952›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2018

Indications for Systemic Fluoroquinolone Therapy in Europe and Prevalence of Primary-Care Prescribing in France, Germany and the UK: Descriptive Population-Based Study.

Daniel R Morales, Jim Slattery, Luis Pinheiro, Xavier Kurz, Karin Hedenmalm

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniel R MoralesPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Pl, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK. Daniel.Morales@ext.ema.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-8069
Jim SlatteryPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Pl, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Luis PinheiroPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Pl, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Xavier KurzPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, 30 Churchill Pl, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5EU, UK.
Karin HedenmalmBusiness Data and Analytics Department, European Medicines Agency, London, UK.
European Medicines Agency · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesIn the USA the benefit-risk profile of fluoroquinolones for treating patients with acute bacterial sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) is considered unfavorable. However, the number of fluoroquinolone products in the EU indicated and prescribed for these infections is uncertain. The objective of this study was to provide data on indications for fluoroquinolones in Europe and examine the prevalence of prescribing in France, Germany and the UK.

methodsDescriptive analysis of indications for systemic fluoroquinolone antibiotics across the European Economic Area (EEA) and descriptive analysis of systemic fluoroquinolone antibiotic prescribing in France, Germany and UK electronic health records (2000-2015).

resultsAll EEA countries had fluoroquinolone products indicated for acute sinusitis, acute bronchitis, or uUTIs, with differences in the number of products between countries for: acute sinusitis (19.5-51.9%), acute bronchitis (22.2-73.4%), and uUTIs (52.0-89.1%). The prevalence of fluoroquinolone prescribing for the treatment of respiratory tract infections (RTIs) appeared to fall with time in all countries and for UTI in France and UK only. Changes were greatest in the UK. In France, Germany, and the UK, respectively: acute sinusitis accounted for 29.5, 20.6, and 40.7% of all oral fluoroquinolone prescriptions for upper RTIs; acute bronchitis accounted for 63.0, 83.0, and 89.9% of all fluoroquinolone prescriptions for lower RTIs; uUTIs accounted for 83.3, 89.9, and 32.2% of all fluoroquinolone prescriptions for UTIs.

conclusionLarge numbers of fluoroquinolone products in Europe are listed for the treatment of milder infections such as acute bronchitis, acute sinusitis and uUTIs. Among the countries assessed, fluoroquinolones were commonly prescribed for these conditions and potentially should lead to a review of therapeutic guidelines.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsPopulation SurveillanceAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBronchitisEuropeFemaleFluoroquinolonesFranceGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID30143952
OpenAlexW2888045002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.