Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143921›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

Is there any diagnostic value of anteroposterior chest radiography in predicting cardiac chamber enlargement?

Hakan Sahin, Divya N Chowdhry, Andrew Olsen, Omar Nemer, Lindsay Wahl

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel method of donor‒recipient size matching in pediatric heart transplantation: A total cardiac volume‒predictive model.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hakan SahinDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. hakan_sahin@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0410-5312
Divya N ChowdhryDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Andrew OlsenDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Omar NemerDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Lindsay WahlDepartment of Anesthesiology, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Rochester Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anteroposterior (AP) portable chest radiograph is routinely performed to evaluate cardiopulmonary status, however heart size can be misrepresented by inherent technical factors. Our aim was to determine diagnostic accuracy of cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) on AP chest radiographs relative to echocardiography, as well as relative to axial computed tomography (CT) and frontal CT scout images in predicting cardiac chamber enlargement. 200 subjects with both chest CT and AP chest radiograph within 1 month were retrospectively identified. Patients with pericardial effusion or obscured heart borders were excluded. 130 of these subjects had also undergone echocardiography. Transverse diameters of the heart and thorax were used to calculate CTRs on AP chest radiograph, scout CT, and axial CT images. A second reader was used to verify measurement accuracy and reproducibility. Statistical analysis of CTRs for AP chest radiograph, CT scout, and axial CT images were calculated using echocardiography as gold standard. AP chest radiographs had higher CTR values than axial and scout CT images (by 0.075, p < 0.001), larger measured heart diameters by approximately 3 cm (p < 0.001), and larger thoracic diameters by approximately 2 cm (p < 0.001). CTRs on AP chest radiographs calculated with a cutoff of 0.50 had sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 32%. Sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 66% respectively when using a cutoff of 0.55, and 34% and 92% respectively when using a cutoff of 0.60. A CTR of 60% is more appropriate than 50-55% when evaluating an AP chest radiograph for cardiac chamber enlargement due to its much higher specificity.

Indexed as

Ventricular Function, LeftVentricular Function, RightVentricular RemodelingEchocardiography, TransesophagealHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularHypertrophy, Right VentricularPredictive Value of TestsRadiography, ThoracicReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnteroposterior radiographAP radiographAxial CTCardiothoracic ratioComputed tomographyCT scout image

Identifiers

PMID30143921
OpenAlexW2888418692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.