Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143854›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Quality of life after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck in patients with or without postoperative complications.

Sanna Lahtinen, Petri Koivunen, Tero Ala-Kokko, Päivi Laurila, Outi Kaarela, Janne H Liisanantti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Quality of Life After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery and Free Flap Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sexual health at 5 years after diagnosis of head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Swallowing-related quality of life after free flap surgery due to cancer of the head and neck.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanna LahtinenResearch Group of Surgery, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. sanna.lahtinen@ppshp.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9337-2764
Petri KoivunenPEDEGO Research Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Tero Ala-KokkoResearch Group of Surgery, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Päivi LaurilaResearch Group of Surgery, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Outi KaarelaDivision of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Janne H LiisananttiResearch Group of Surgery, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Division of Intensive Care, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advances in surgical techniques, postoperative complications are frequent after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck. The present study assessed quality of life (QOL) in patients with and without postoperative complications.

methodsQOL was evaluated using RAND-36, EORTC-C30 and H&N-35, and UW-QOL questionnaires.

resultsOf 53 assessed patients, 29 (54.7%) had at least one complication. Those with medical complications (n = 12, 22.6%) had significantly lower QOL in all domains of RAND-36 except emotional well-being. They also reported lower scores in EORTC-C30 domains of financial difficulties, pain, and insomnia and UW-QOL domains of pain, activity, and recreation. The QOL for patients without complications was comparable to the general population.

conclusionQOL after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck is reduced in patients with postoperative medical complications.

Indexed as

Free Tissue FlapsPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsCancer of the head and neckFree flap surgeryPostoperative complicationsQuality of life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.