ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cell carcinoma, from imaging, molecular biomarkers to multimodal AI: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- AssessingNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Current Role of PET CT in Staging and Management of Penile Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Prediction of outcomes in patients with local recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: development and validation of a four-factor prognostic model integrating baseline characteristics and [European radiology · 2023Article
- Imaging for the Initial Staging and Post-Treatment Surveillance of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- An update on treatment of penile cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Review
- Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count and Lymph Node Density on Overall Survival of Penile Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer.International urology and nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePenile cancer (PC) is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and variable prognosis. Lymph node (LN) involvement and pathological features of the primary lesion have been proven to be the most important survival factors. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose labelled with fluorine-18 (
methodsFifty-five patients (mean age 56.6 y) diagnosed with penile squamous cell carcinoma were prospectively evaluated from 2012 to 2014. All subjects underwent
resultsOut of the 53 patients selected, 17 (32.1%) had localized disease (cT1-2) and 24 (45.3%) had palpable nodes (cN+). Partial penile amputation was performed in 38 patients (71.7%) and inguinal lymphadenectomy (LND) in 30 (56.6%). From the LND group, 16 (53.3%) presented with positive neoplastic cells (pN+). Patients with more aggressive disease had a significantly (p = 0.019) higher
conclusionThis study showed promising results on the use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.