ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2018
[Current treatment of systemic scleroderma].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Systemic sclerosis].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Elastography as a possible useful method of assessment of skin involvement in systemic sclerosis.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022Article
- [How I treat calcinosis cutis in the context of collagenosis…].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2021Article
- [The skin and rheumatism].Der Orthopade · 2019Review
- [Sclerosing skin diseases].Der Internist · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) is a severe, chronic inflammatory connective tissue disease involving the skin, musculoskeletal system, and several internal organs. The heterogeneity of its presentation and course are a particular challenge for the treating physician. As therapeutic options have improved considerably during recent years, various working groups have published consensus recommendations for the treatment of SSc. The aim of this overview is to present major aspects of these recommendations and embed them in a concept of modern interdisciplinary care for this often still devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30143809What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.