Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143785›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2019

Estimated skeletal muscle mass and density values measured on computed tomography examinations in over 1000 living kidney donors.

Jeroen L A van Vugt, Yordi van Putten, Irma M van der Kall, Stefan Buettner, Frank C H D'Ancona, Helena M Dekker, Hendrikus J A N Kimenai, Ron W F de Bruin, Michiel C Warlé, Jan N M IJzermans

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lumbar muscle involvement in the occurrence of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Current Therapeutic Targets in Cancer Cachexia: A Pathophysiologic Approach.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeroen L A van VugtDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands. j.l.a.vanvugt@erasmusmc.nl.
Yordi van PuttenDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Irma M van der KallDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Stefan BuettnerDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Frank C H D'AnconaDepartment of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Helena M DekkerDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Hendrikus J A N KimenaiDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ron W F de BruinDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Michiel C WarléDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jan N M IJzermansDepartment of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCurrently, there are no widely accepted cut-off points to categorize patients as sarcopenic (low skeletal muscle mass) or myosteatotic based on computed tomography (CT) measurements. Moreover, little is known about skeletal muscle mass in healthy subjects, particularly in a Western-European population. SUBJECTS/

methodsSkeletal muscle mass (skeletal muscle index, cm

resultsOf the 1073 included patients, 499 (46.5%) were male and the median age and BMI were 51 years and 25.4 kg/m

conclusionsSkeletal muscle density and mass were significantly associated with sex, age, and BMI in a large cohort of healthy Western-European subjects. The newly developed nomograms may be used to calculate the estimated healthy skeletal muscle mass for individuals in patient populations.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAbdomenAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalReference ValuesTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.