ArticleScientific reports2018
A magnet-actuated biomimetic device for isolating biological entities in microwells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mem-dELISA platform for dual color and ultrasensitive digital detection of colocalized proteins on extracellular vesicles.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Article
- Laser-Enabled Surface Treatment of Disposable Endoscope Lens with Superior Antifouling and Optical Properties.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microwell platforms show great promise in single-cell studies and protein measurements because of their low volume sampling, rapid analysis and high throughput screening ability. However, the existing actuation mechanisms to manipulate the target samples and fabrication procedures involved in the microwell-based microfluidic devices are complex, resource-intensive and require an external power source. In this work, we present proof of concept of a simple, power-free and low-cost closed magnet digital microfluidics device for isolating biological entities in femtoliter-sized microwells. The target biological entities were encapsulated in magnetic liquid marbles and shuttled back and forth between micropatterned top and bottom plates in the microdevice to obtain high loading efficiency and short processing time. The microdevice performance was studied through fluorescent detection of three different entities: microbeads, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and Escherichia coli, captured in the microwell array. Almost 80% of the microwells were loaded with single microbeads in five shuttling cycles, in less than a minute. Further, a low volume of BSA was compartmentalized in the microwell array over a two order range of concentration. The microdevice exhibits two unique features: lotus leaf stamps were used to fabricate micropatterns (microwells and micropillars) on top and bottom plates to impart functionality and cost-effectiveness, and the target samples were actuated by a permanent magnet to make the microdevice power-free and simple in operation. The developed biomimetic microdevice is therefore capable of capturing a multitude of biological entities in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.