Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143234›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Electrical Communication in Lymphangions.

Bjørn Olav Hald, Jorge Augusto Castorena-Gonzalez, Scott David Zawieja, Peichun Gui, Michael John Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pacemaking in the lymphatic system.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ERG KScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Lymphatic Clearance and Pump Function.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. KAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bjørn Olav HaldDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jorge Augusto Castorena-GonzalezDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Scott David ZawiejaDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Peichun GuiDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Michael John DavisDepartment of Medical Pharmacology and Physiology, Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri. Electronic address: davismj@health.missouri.edu.
University of Missouri · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Lymphatic pacemaking and pumping in lymphedema: function, dysfunction, and rescueR01HL122578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2015 to 2023
$4.1M
Conduction and coordination of electrical signals within the lymphatic vascular wallR01HL125608 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122578NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contractions of lymphangions, i.e., the segment between two one-way lymphatic valves, generate the pressure gradients that propel lymph back to the circulation. Each lymphangion is comprised of an inner sheet of lymphatic endothelial cells circumscribed by one or more layers of lymphatic muscle cells (LMCs). Each contraction is produced by an LMC action potential (AP) that propagates via gap junctions along the lymphangion. Yet, electrical coupling within and between cell layers and the impact on AP waves is poorly understood. Here, we combine studies in rat and mouse lymphatic vessels with mathematical modeling to show that initiation of AP waves depends on high input resistance (low current drain), whereas propagation depends on morphology and sufficient LMC:LMC coupling. Simulations show that 1) myoendothelial coupling is insignificant to facilitate AP generation and sustain an experimentally measured cross-junctional potential difference of 25 mV, i.e., AP waves propagate along the LMC layer only; 2) LMC:LMC resistance is estimated around 2-10 MΩ but depends on vessel structure and cell-cell coupling, e.g., some degree of LMC overlap protects AP waves against LMC decoupling; 3) the propensity of AP wave initiation is highest around the valves, where the density of LMCs is low; and 4) a single pacemaker cell embedded in the LMC layer must be able to generate very large currents to overcome the current drain from the layer. However, the required current generation to initiate an AP wave is reduced upon stimulation of multiple adjacent LMCs. With stimulation of all LMCs, AP waves can also arise from heterogeneity in the electrical activity of LMCs. The findings advance our understanding of the electrical constraints that underlie initiation of APs in the LMC layer and make testable predictions about how morphology, LMC excitability, and LMC:LMC electrical coupling interact to determine the ability to initiate and propagate AP waves in small lymphatic vessels.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAnimalsLymphatic SystemMiceModels, BiologicalRats

Identifiers

PMID30143234
PMCPMC6127464
OpenAlexW2886520995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.