Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30143041›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Evaluation of the national policy of single screening and treatment for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy in two districts in Eastern Indonesia: health provider perceptions.

Jenny Hill, Chandra U R Landuwulang, Ansariadi, Jenna Hoyt, Faustina H Burdam, Irene Bonsapia, Din Syafruddin, Jeanne R Poespoprodjo, Feiko O Ter Kuile, Rukhsana Ahmed and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jenny HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. jenny.hill@lstmed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-485X
Chandra U R LanduwulangEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
AnsariadiEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Jenna HoytDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Faustina H BurdamMimika District Health Authority, Timika, Papua, Indonesia.
Irene BonsapiaTimika Malaria Research Program, Papuan Health and Community Development Foundation, Timika, Papua, Indonesia.
Din SyafruddinEijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Jeanne R PoespoprodjoMimika District Health Authority, Timika, Papua, Indonesia.
Feiko O Ter KuileDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Rukhsana AhmedDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Jayne WebsterDisease Control Department, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100654Medical Research Council (UK)/Department for International Development/Wellcome Trust Joint Global Health Trials Scheme 100024Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria in pregnancy has devastating consequences for both the expectant mother and baby. Annually, 88.2 (70%) of the 125.2 million pregnancies in malaria endemic regions occur in the Asia-Pacific region. The control of malaria in pregnancy in most of Asia relies on passive case detection and prevention with long-lasting insecticide-treated nets. Indonesia was the first country in the region to introduce, in 2012, malaria screening at pregnant women's first antenatal care visit to reduce the burden of malaria in pregnancy. The study assessed health providers' acceptability and perceptions on the feasibility of implementing the single screening and treatment (SST) strategy in the context of the national programme in two endemic provinces of Indonesia.

methodsQualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with 86 health providers working in provision of antenatal care (midwives, doctors, laboratory staff, pharmacists, and heads of drug stores), heads of health facilities and District Health Office staff in West Sumba and Mimika districts in East Nusa Tenggara and Papua provinces, respectively.

resultsHealth providers of all cadres were accepting of SST as a preventive strategy, showing a strong preference for microscopy over rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) as the method of screening. Implementation of the policy was inconsistent in both sites, with least extensive implementation reported in West Sumba compared to Mimika. SST was predominantly implemented at health centre level using microscopy, whereas implementation at community health posts was said to occur in less than half the selected health facilities. Lack of availability of RDTs was cited as the major factor that prevented provision of SST at health posts, however as village midwives cannot prescribe medicines women who test positive are referred to health centres for anti-malarials. Few midwives had received formal training on SST or related topics.

conclusionsThe study findings indicate that SST was an acceptable strategy among health providers, however implementation was inconsistent with variation across different localities within the same district, across levels of facility, and across different cadres within the same health facility. Implementation should be re-invigorated through reorientation and training of health providers, stable supplies of more sensitive RDTs, and improved data capture and reporting.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeFemaleHealth PolicyHumansIndonesiaMalariaMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPrenatal CareAcceptabilityAntimalarialsDihydroartemisinin–piperaquineHealth providersMalaria in pregnancyMalaria preventionSingle screening and treatment

Identifiers

PMID30143041
PMCPMC6108151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.