SynthesisMedicine2018
Nurse-led interventions on quality of life for patients with cancer: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Digital Health Interventions on Symptom Management and Quality of Life in Cancer Patients Undergoing Systemic Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of nurse-led interventions on quality of life in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of a nurse-led online patient support program on fatigue, sleep and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a quasi-experimental study.BMC neurology · 2025Trial
- The effect of distance nurse-led fatigue management on fatigue, sleep quality, and self-efficacy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a quasi-experimental study.BMC neurology · 2023Trial
- Experiences and coping strategies related to constipation among individuals with cancer: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Understanding, Recognizing, and Managing Cancer-Related Fatigue Associated with Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews.PloS one · 2024Review
- Nurse-led emergency department avoidance model of care for patients receiving cancer therapy in the ambulatory setting: a health service improvement initiative.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Improving Outcome-Driven Care in Multiple Myeloma Using Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Qualitative Evaluation Study.The patient · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Symptom Management Intervention for Improving the QOL of Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
- The Influence of Family-Oriented Enabling Psychological Nursing on Posttraumatic Stress and Fear of Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Article
- A nurse-led paediatric oncology fast-track clinic proves a successful ambulatory intervention for patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- How Nurses in Nursing Community Clinics Enhance Client Care Under Thailand's Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS): A Qualitative Research.Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)Article
- Clinical efficacy of early postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with Temozolomide chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant glioma.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo compare the quality of life outcome between nurse-led and non-nurse-led interventions for patients with cancer using a meta-analysis.
methodsA systematic literature review was performed by searching randomized controlled trials about nurse-led interventions in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until June 2017. Pooled summary estimates for quality of life outcome was calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD) either on a fixed- or random-effect model via Stata 13.0 software.
resultsSeven literatures involving 1110 patients (554 in the nurse-led group and 556 in the control group) were included. Pooled analysis showed there were no differences in the global quality of life, cognitive, emotional, role, social and physical functions, appetite loss, diarrhea, and dyspnea scales of Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 version 3.0 core (QLQ-C30) questionnaires between the nurse-led and control groups. However, the nurse-led management program significantly decreased the occurrence of constipation (SMD = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.71 to -0.00; P = .001) and insomnia (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.99 to 0.32; P = .011) and reduced the financial difficulty (SMD = -0.34, 95% CI = -0.65 to -0.03; P = .033) for patients with cancer.
conclusionThe nurse-led disease management strategy seemed to be effective to improve constipation, insomnia, and financial impacts for patients with cancer in quality of life assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.