SynthesisMedicine2018
Safety of antivascular endothelial growth factor administration in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents in the treatment of primary pterygium.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Co-host ncRNA MIR503HG/miR-503-5p antagonistically interfere with the crosstalk between fibroblasts and microvascular endothelial cells by affecting the production of LMW FGF2 in pterygium.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Bevacizumab Eye Drops Vs. Intra-meibomian Gland Injection of Bevacizumab for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction-Associated Posterior Blepharitis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Role of bevacizumab intraocular injection in the management of neovascular glaucoma.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Complications of intrastromal bevacizumab injection in lamellar keratoplasty.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-VEGF agents has been widely used in ocular diseases, but its safety for treating anterior segment disorders, the conclusions are controversial.
methodsSeveral major databases, including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, were searched. Safety data from 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were used to compare anti-VEGF treatment in the ocular anterior segment in pterygium and neovascular glaucoma treatment with placebo/sham treatment for eye diseases. A meta-analysis for adverse events was performed.
resultsEighteen RCT studies with 955 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. Significant difference in conjunctival disorders (OR: 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.59; P = .05) was noted among the included studies, but not in ocular intolerance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.34-1.62; P = .46), corneal disorders (OR: 0.71; 95% CI, 0.37-1.37; P = .31), or the subgroup analysis of conjunctival disorders.
conclusionsThe administration of anti-VEGF agents in the ocular anterior segment for patients with pterygium and glaucoma was tolerable in tolerance and cornea, but was the risk factor of conjunctival disorders. The healing of corneal epithelium may be delayed in patients with primary corneal epithelial defects after anti-VEGF application. However, due to the limited evidence, further research should be performed on the safety of anti-VEGF administration in patients with different corneal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.