Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142808›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Functional Foxp3 polymorphisms and the susceptibility to cancer: An update meta-analysis.

ZhenYun Cheng, Yan Guo, Liang Ming

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association ofCancer genomics & proteomics
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Genetic and Epigenetic Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Association betweenTranslational neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. The impact ofJournal of Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

ZhenYun ChengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China.
Yan Guo
Liang Ming
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForkhead box P3 (Foxp3) plays important roles in the development and pathogensis of cancer. To investigate the association of 3 polymorphisms of Foxp3 (rs3761548, rs 3761549 and rs2280883) and cancer risk, an updated meta-analysis was performed.

methodsAround 11 studies including 4344 cancer patients and 4665 healthy controls were selected for this meta-analysis. There were nine studies with 3783 cases and 4096 controls for rs3761548, 4 studies with 1669 cases and 1613 controls for rs3761549 and 4 studies with 1821 cases and 1799 controls for rs2280883. Odds radios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the cancer risk.

resultsMeta-analysis showed that rs3761548 was associated with an increased cancer risk in the overall population under the recessive model (AA vs CA + CC: OR = 1.45, 95%CI = 1.03-2.02, P = .03). No association was found between rs3761549, rs2280883 polymorphisms, and cancer susceptibility in the overall population. Nonetheless, in the genotyping methods subgroup analysis of rs2280883, a lower risk of cancer was found in studies using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) under the allelic model (C vs T: OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.52-0.95, P = .02), heterozygote model (TC vs TT: OR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.41-0.87, P = .008) and dominant model (CC + TC vs TT: OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.45-0.90, P = .01). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types showed C allele or TC carriers were insusceptible to cancer under 3 genetic models (C vs T: OR = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64-0.95, P = .01; TC vs TT: OR = 0.50, 95%CI = 0.32-0.79, P = .003; CC + TC vs TT: OR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.51-0.82, P < .001).

conclusionOur results suggest that rs3761548 polymorphism is associated with cancer risk.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideForkhead Transcription FactorsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansModels, GeneticNeoplasmsOdds RatioForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30142808
PMCPMC6113014
OpenAlexW2888625159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.