Observational studyMedicine2018
Clinical diagnosis for dusk phenomenon of diabetes.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insulin Requirements for Basal and Auto-Correction Insulin Delivery in Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop System: 4193 Days' Real-World Data of Children in Two Different Age Groups.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Time in Range and Dusk Phenomenon in Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2023Article
- Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Insulin Pumps Need Widely Heterogeneous Basal Rate Profiles Ranging from Negligible to Pronounced Diurnal Variability.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Twenty-Four Hour Fasting (Basal Rate) Tests to Achieve Custom-Tailored, Hour-by-Hour Basal Insulin Infusion Rates in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pumps (CSII).Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Spontaneous and transient hyperglycemia before sleep in a patient with glaucomatous blindness and diabetes: A case reprt.Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diabetes dusk phenomenon (spontaneous and transient pre-dinner hyperglycemia) anecdotally exists but has not been investigated.A total of 80 diabetic patients that received continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions were retrospectively studied. They were grouped into a routine group (R) (consecutive δDG [dusk blood glucose difference] <0 mmol/L) and a classic dusk phenomenon group (CDP, consecutive δDG≥0 mmol/L). δDG represents differences in blood glucose measurements between pre-dinner and post-lunch (δDG: dusk blood glucose difference). Other patients were placed in a suspicious group (S). The suspicious group was further divided into 3 groups based on the frequency at which the δDG occurred: suspicious 1 group (S1), δDG≥0 mmol/L occurred once only; suspicious 3 group (S3), δDG < 0 mmol/L occurred once only, and the remaining patients were grouped in the suspicious 2 group (S2).We identified the CDP and S3 groups as the "clinical dusk phenomenon" group (CLDP). We confirmed that the S1 and R groups to be in the "clinical routine" group. The S2 group was significantly different from the CDP group. In addition, the S2 group had significant differences in δDG measurements and post-lunch blood glucose values compared with the R group, but no differences in other parameters were seen. Multiple comparisons with the other suspicious groups also showed no statistical difference in many parameters. Thus, we placed these patients into the "suspicious clinical dusk phenomenon" group (SDP). The δDG cut-off for the CLDP group was 1.0167 mmol/L. The pre-dinner-pre-lunch blood glucose cut-off for this group was 2.72 mmol/L. The δDG cut-off for the SDP group was -0.95 mmol/L. The pre-dinner-pre-lunch blood glucose cut-off for this group was 0.87 mmol/L. The cut-off points for the post-dinner-post-lunch blood glucose measurements in the CLDP and SDP groups were both 1.2667 mmol/L.A consecutive δDG≥0 or a once only δDG < 0 could be diagnosed as falling into the CLDP group. The CLDP could be excluded when a consecutive δDG < 0 or a once only δDG≥0 was found. Patients falling into other categories were placed into the SDP group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.