Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142778›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Reduction of the radiation dose and the amount of contrast material in hepatic dynamic CT using low tube voltage and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional.

Atsushi Nakamoto, Kiyohito Yamamoto, Makoto Sakane, Go Nakai, Akira Higashiyama, Hiroshi Juri, Shushi Yoshikawa, Yoshifumi Narumi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05716620 (Utility of Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Screening Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05716620 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Utility of Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Screening Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhRan2022 to 2025Enrolled380ConditionsHepatocellular CarcinomaArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Atsushi NakamotoDepartment of Radiology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita Central Radiology Department, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Kiyohito Yamamoto
Makoto Sakane
Go Nakai
Akira Higashiyama
Hiroshi Juri
Shushi Yoshikawa
Yoshifumi Narumi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the image quality and the diagnostic ability of low tube voltage and reduced contrast material dose hepatic dynamic computed tomography (CT) reconstructed with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional (AIDR 3D).Eighty-nine patients underwent hepatic dynamic CT using one of the 2 protocols: tube voltage of 120 kVp, contrast dose of 600 mgI/kg, and filtered back projection in Protocol A (n = 46), and tube voltage of 100 kVp, contrast dose of 500 mgI/kg, and AIDR 3D in Protocol B (n = 43). The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) were compared between the 2 groups. Objective image noise and tumor to liver contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also compared. Three radiologists independently reviewed image quality. The jackknife alternative free-response receiver-operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis was performed to compare diagnostic performance.The mean CTDIvol and SSDE of Protocol B (14.3 and 20.2, respectively) were significantly lower than those of Protocol A (22.1 and 31.4, P < .001). There were no significant differences in either objective image noise or CNR. In the qualitative analysis, 2 readers assigned significant lower scores to images of Protocol B for at least one of the 3 phases regarding overall image quality (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the JAFROC1 figure of merit between protocols.Low tube voltage CT with AIDR 3D yielded a reduction in radiation dose and in the amount of contrast material while maintaining diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularContrast MediaFemaleHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID30142778
PMCPMC6113013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.