Observational studyMedicine2018
Low dose of azathioprine is effective to induce and maintain remission in active Crohn disease: A prospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in the risk of clinical failure between thiopurine and methotrexate in bio-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a Korean nationwide population-based study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Relapse rates after withdrawal of thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
- Budding Multi-matrix Technology-a Retrospective Approach, Deep Insights, and Future Perspectives.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2021Review
- Effectiveness of Infliximab on Deep Radiological Remission in Chinese Patients with Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Usefulness of Measuring Thiopurine Metabolites in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Autoimmunological Hepatitis, Treated with Azathioprine.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2021Article
- Efficacy of early intervention on the bowel damage and intestinal surgery of Crohn's disease, based on the Lémann index.BMC gastroenterology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Azathioprine (AZA) 2 to 2.5 mg/kg/d is recommended for European patients with Crohn disease (CD), but several Asian studies reported that low dose of AZA was also effective to treat CD. To confirm those observations, we perform this prospective observational study to compare the efficacy and safety of low and standard doses of AZA in the treatment of active CD.This was a prospective, open-labeled observational study. Two hundred twenty-six active CD patients were divided into 2 groups and treated with AZA 1.5 or 2.0 mg/kg/d respectively, combined with steroid therapy. Patients were followed up for 96 weeks. The complete remission (CR) rate, response rate, relapse rate, and adverse effect rate were assessed at weeks 24, 48, and 96 by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.Azathioprine 1.5 mg/kg/d showed no significant difference compared with AZA 2 mg/kg/d in CR rate, response rate and relapse rate by ITT analysis at week 24, 48, or 96 (all P > .05). Their adverse effect rates had no significant difference either (P > .05). Up to 21.7% (49/226) of the patients reported adverse events and 69.4% (34/49) of them were myelosuppresion.Azathioprine 1.5 mg/kg/d combined with steroids is as effective as AZA 2.0 mg/kg/d to induce remission of active CD in the first 6 months, and to maintain remission of inactive CD in the first 2 years, without increasing the recurrence of active CD after clinical remission. The most common adverse effect is myelosuppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.