Observational studyMedicine2018
Microsurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma: Experiences on 183 consecutive patients.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two-stage surgery for cystic craniopharyngiomas: a purely endoscopic strategy and outcomes.Pituitary · 2025Article
- Enhanced outcomes in residual or recurrent craniopharyngioma: evaluating combined gamma knife and phosphorus-32 brachytherapy.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Article
- Clinical characterization of pediatric supratentorial tumors and prediction of pituitary insufficiency in two tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia.International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2022Article
- Biochemical profile of paediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas: A prospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Craniopharyngioma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to summarize the clinical experiences and postoperative effects of microsurgical approaches for craniopharyngioma.A total of 183 craniopharyngioma patients who underwent microsurgical treatment since March 2009 to March 2015 in our hospital were included in current research. Surgical approaches were selected based on preoperative evaluations, including tumor locations, sizes, and growth patterns. Active measurements to manage water-electrolyte disorder and insipidus were taken for postoperative treatments. During the follow-up, patients were monitored for residual or recurrent tumor by postoperative contrast MRI scans done 1 to 3 months after surgery.The used surgical approaches were as follows: frontopterional approach (76 cases), anterior interhemispheric approach (58 cases), transcallosal approach (10 cases), transsphenoidal approach (15 cases), unilateral subfrontal approach (15 cases), and combined approaches (9 cases). Around 124 cases (72.7%) received total tumor resection, 37 patients (20.2%) underwent subtotal resection, and 13 patients (7.1%) underwent partial removal. No significant difference was found on the postoperative complications among the different microsurgical approaches (all, P > .05). A total of 111 cases had an intact pituitary stalk preservation and 26 cases had partially preserved stalks during surgery. Visual improvement was achieved in 54 patients and visual deterioration occurred in 22 cases. Postoperative insipidus appeared in 114 cases and water-electrolyte disorder occurred in 99 cases. The postsurgical follow-up ranged from 3 to 69 months with a mean duration of 27.3 months and 23 patients suffered recurrence.Based on careful preoperative evaluation, microsurgical treatments may be safe and effective approach to improve postoperative outcomes of craniopharyngioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.