Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142491›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2018

Functional genomic insights into the environmental determinants of mammalian fitness.

Noah Snyder-Mackler, Amanda J Lea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noah Snyder-MacklerDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Washington National Primate Research Center, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: nsmack@uw.edu.
Amanda J LeaLewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: alea@princeton.edu.

Funding

Gene regulatory analysis of social integration and resilience during agingR00AG051764 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SNYDER-MACKLER, NOAH · 2017 to 2019
$746k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG051764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both the social and physical environment shape health, reproduction, and survival across many species, and identifying how these effects manifest at the molecular level has long been a priority in medicine and evolutionary biology. The recent rise of functional genomics has enabled researchers to gain new insights into how environmental inputs shape variation in gene regulation, and consequently, downstream organism-level traits. Here, we discuss recent work on this topic, as well as key knowledge gaps. Research in this area spans a wide range of taxa, but we focus our review on mammalian species because of their close evolutionary proximity to humans and because of their relevance for understanding human health. Improving our understanding of how the environment and the genome are connected promises to shed new light on the mechanisms underlying environmentally-induced disease in humans, as well as the evolution of environmental sensitivity more generally.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessGenomicsAnimalsBiological EvolutionGene-Environment InteractionGene Expression RegulationHumansMammalsReproduction

Identifiers

PMID30142491
PMCPMC6296864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.