Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30142317›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2018

Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target in Resistant and Non-Resistant Hypertension: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Level Data from SPRINT and ACCORD.

Steven M Smith, Matthew J Gurka, David A Calhoun, Yan Gong, Carl J Pepine, Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Burden of Resistant Hypertension Across the World.Current hypertension reports · 2022
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Blood Pressure Control and Protection of the Aging Brain.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M SmithDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; Department of Community Health & Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville. Electronic address: ssmith@cop.ufl.edu.
Matthew J GurkaDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
David A CalhounVascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Yan GongDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Carl J PepineDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoffDepartment of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
University of Florida · USAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacy · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI W Timothy GARVEY · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
UFRCC for Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research NetworkUM1HL087366 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PEPINE, CARL J · 2012 to 2018
$4.7M
Brain-Gut Microbiome-Immune Axis in HypertensionR01HL132448 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Carl J Pepine, Steven Michael Smith · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
BRAIN ANGIOTENSIN IN HYPERTENSIVE NEURONS IN CULTURER01HL033610 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI RAIZADA, MOHAN K., SUMNERS, COLIN · 1985 to 2017
$4.3M
Advancing Personalized Hypertension Care through Big Data ScienceK01HL138172 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SMITH, STEVEN MICHAEL · 2018 to 2022
$726k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL138172NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL033610NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL132448NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL087366NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies suggest benefits of blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular risk may be attenuated in patients with resistant hypertension compared with the general hypertensive population, but prospective data are lacking.

methodsWe assessed intensive (<120 mm Hg) versus standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure targets on adverse outcome risk according to baseline resistant hypertension status, using Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) and Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) patient-level data. Patients were categorized as having baseline apparent resistant hypertension (blood pressure ≥130/80 mm Hg while using 3 antihypertensive drugs or use of ≥4 drugs regardless of blood pressure) or non-resistant hypertension (all others). Cox regression was used to assess effects of treatment assignment, resistant hypertension status, their interaction, and other covariates, on first occurrence of 2 outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death ± heart failure, and the same outcomes plus all-cause death, individually.

resultsAmong 14,094 patients, 2710 (19.2%) had baseline apparent resistant hypertension. In adjusted models, an intensive target reduced risk of both outcomes (myocardial infarction/stroke/cardiovascular death: hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.93; myocardial infarction/stroke/heart failure/cardiovascular death: HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.69-0.88) as well as stroke (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.94) and heart failure (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). An intensive target also appeared to reduce myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death risk. Benefits were observed irrespective of baseline resistant hypertension status.

conclusionsOur findings provide the first evidence to support guidance to treat resistant hypertension to the same blood pressure goal as non-resistant hypertension.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsACCORDAntihypertensive agentsBlood pressureHypertensionResistant hypertensionSPRINT

Identifiers

PMID30142317
PMCPMC6279479
OpenAlexW2888537650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.